Double-precision performance is not as good with Maxwell as it was for Kepler.Supports NVENC encode, HEVC decode, NVIDIA Mosaic, and NVIDIA nView. Supports 4x 4K/60Hz displays (or 1x 5K/60Hz).Will fit into many different form-factors. Power efficient (75W) doesn’t breach 60☌ at load in a normal system.Offers great creative performance at its price-point.If you want the fastest under $500 workstation graphics card today, NVIDIA’s Quadro M2000 is it. ![]() Even with the price delta, M2000 sets itself as the far more powerful option, and if the card does in fact end up hovering around ~$400, its appeal is only going to increase, versus AMD’s immediate competition.Īt the end of the day, and as mentioned above, your need for a workstation card will differ based on what you’re using it for. NVIDIA RTX and NVIDIA Quadro ® professional desktop products are designed, built and engineered to accelerate any professional workflow, making it the top choice for millions of creative and technical users. With a general look at performance, the M2000 wipes the floor with the W4300 – as it should for a card that costs 66% more (at least, per SRP). Our results exist to help you make sure that the card you’re choosing is going to deliver the best possible performance in that particular scenario, and at that particular price point. Whether the M2000 or W4300 is better-suited for you will depend entirely on what you’re going to use the card for. Having higher pixel fillrate allows the card to draw more pixels on screen and off screen, which is beneficial for some 3D effects in games, or when playing at higher display. It outperformed it in our rendering tests, our CAD tests, and even our gaming tests. With more Raster Operations Pipelines (ROPs) and higher graphics clock, the Quadro P2000 GPU offers significantly better pixel fill rate. There were only a couple of scenarios where AMD’s struck ahead, and more often than not, NVIDIA’s card vastly outperformed it. Overall, the M2000 is without question faster than the W4300. Compared to AMD’s FirePro W4300, which sells (right now) for $300? That depends on the test. Compared to the Quadro K5000, which was released four years ago for more than four times the price of the M2000, the newest Quadro is downright incredible. Final Thoughtsĭoes NVIDIA’s final Maxwell-based Quadro deliver the punch we were hoping? That depends on your perspective. Both of these cards peaked at 150W during load. From a temperature standpoint, the W4300 peaked at 6☌ higher than the M2000, but idled at a staggering 19☌ higher, thanks to its simpler cooler design. ![]() The card even managed to shave 11W off of the PC’s idle power draw, becoming the only card to dip below 90W. Table 1 Edge server hardware information Type Device name Specification GPU NVIDIA Quadro M2000 768 NVIDIA Cores 4 GB GDDR5 GPU Memory PCI Express 3.0×16. Finally – here’s a set of tests that put the M2000 ahead of everything else. item 2 HP NVIDIA Quadro M2000 846379-001 844223-001 Video Card 4GB GDDR5 4 DP GPU dellHP NVIDIA Quadro M2000 846379-001 844223-001 Video Card 4GB GDDR5 4 DP GPU dell.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |